Hume's opinion concerning belief of miracles is reasonable. He makes a good argument, and prompts deeper thinking into what I believe and why. I do not believe that all testimonies are untrustworthy. He gives good reasoning for how they can be exaggerated, but then again, he can not prove that they are not true. This reading was interesting to me, and I'm not exactly sure what to think about it honestly. The whole concept of questioning the Bible's accuracy baffles me. I simply read God's word, and I believe it.
I commented on Daniel's post.
I agree with your statement that not all testimonies are untrustworthy, yet they could be exaggerated for dramatic effect. Questioning the accuracy of the Bible sometimes confuses me as well, but I do find it important that we question it in order to confirm the solidity of its truth and its trustworthiness.
ReplyDelete